Firms with static drawdown tiers and published profit splits of 90% or more.
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
This ranking uses payout access with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, payout_cap_basis.
Firms with static drawdown tiers include DayTraders, Funded Futures Network and Trade Day. Compare their splits in the list above.
It changes where the floor sits, not the risk of trading. A static floor never moves up, so profits can widen your buffer; with trailing drawdown each new high raises the floor. Losses can still end the account either way.
Static drawdown tiers typically have smaller dollar limits and fewer contracts. Current static drawdown on 50K evaluations ranges from $1,000. The trade-off is a fixed floor vs larger limits.