Prop Firms With 100% Profit Split
Prop firms whose current published rules pay 100% of at least some funded profits, with the earnings each 100% tier covers.
Public Evidence Status
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
0 ready3 lower-confidence0 unavailable
1
Checked Jul 10, 2026 · apextraderfunding.com77 changes pending review since Sep 30, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$19.9
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_processing_time.
1 public evidence
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Up to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_fee
2
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · daytraders.com269 changes pending review since Jun 13, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$22.5
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, payout_cap_basis.
1 public evidence1 derived public
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Selected comparison outcome: 100K Static Evaluation
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmin_payout_amount
Selected path100K Static EvaluationReady
25K EOD Evaluation25K Full Evaluation25K Static Evaluation25K Straight to Funded
3.jpg&w=96&q=75)
Legends TradingEstimatedLabeled lower-confidence rankingPartly unverified inputs: some of this firm's rules have no public source (last public source 2026-03-17), so this uses their last stored values.
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · thelegendstrading.com143 changes pending review since Apr 11, 2026May be out of dateEstimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$59
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
Frequently Asked Questions
Which prop firms offer 100% profit split?
Current rules pay 100% of at least some profits at Apex Trader Funding, DayTraders and Legends Trading. Check each firm for the earnings the 100% tier covers.
Is 100% profit split really 100%?
Read the fine print. A 100% split can cover only some profits, some plans or some payouts, and withdrawal fees can reduce what you keep. Check each firm's current published split tiers and payout rules.
Do 100% split firms have stricter rules?
Not necessarily. Compare drawdown, consistency and payout caps alongside the split: the 100% split is one term among several.