Prop Firms With Evaluations Under $100
Start trading funded for less than $100. The most affordable prop firm evaluations available right now.
Public Evidence Status
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
0 ready10 lower-confidence1 unavailable
1
Checked Jul 10, 2026 · apextraderfunding.com77 changes pending review since Sep 30, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$19.9
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_processing_time.
1 public evidence
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Public price evidence
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_fee
2
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · daytraders.com269 changes pending review since Jun 13, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$22.5
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, payout_cap_basis.
1 public evidence1 derived public
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Selected comparison outcome: 25K Static Evaluation
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmin_payout_amount
Selected path25K Static EvaluationReady
25K EOD Evaluation25K Full Evaluation25K Static Evaluation25K Straight to Funded
3
Checked Jul 17, 2026 · tradeday.comVerified Jun 12, 2026 · tradeday.com170 changes pending review since Jun 18, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$62
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: capital_efficiency_score, max_payout_per_request, payout_cap_basis, payout_pct_of_balance.
1 derived public1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Payout cap basis is unknown for at least one capped public payout rule.Selected comparison outcome: 25K Quick Pay Intraday Evaluation -> 25K Quick Pay Funded Sim
Blocking public fields
capital_efficiency_scoremax_payout_per_requestpayout_cap_basispayout_pct_of_balance
Selected path25K Quick Pay Intraday Evaluation -> 25K Quick Pay Funded SimPartial public data
25K Quick Pay Intraday Evaluation -> 25K Quick Pay Funded Sim25K Quick Pay EOD Evaluation -> 25K Quick Pay Funded Sim25K Fast Pass EOD Evaluation -> 25K Fast Pass Funded Sim50K Quick Pay Intraday Evaluation -> 50K Quick Pay Funded Sim
4
Checked Jun 29, 2026 · myfundedfutures.comVerified Jun 12, 2026 · myfundedfutures.com200 changes pending review since Jun 14, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$62.5
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: daily_loss_limit_dollars, max_payout_per_request, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_cap_basis, unsourced_family_economics.
1 derived public1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Payout cap basis is unknown for at least one capped public payout rule.Selected comparison outcome: 25K Builder Evaluation -> 25K Builder Funded
Blocking public fields
daily_loss_limit_dollarsmax_payout_per_requestmin_profitable_days_before_payoutpayout_cap_basisunsourced_family_economics
Selected path25K Builder Evaluation -> 25K Builder FundedPartial public data
25K Rapid Evaluation -> 25K Rapid Funded25K Rapid EOD Evaluation -> 25K Rapid EOD Funded25K Builder Evaluation -> 25K Builder Funded50K Rapid Evaluation -> 50K Rapid Funded
5
Checked Jun 16, 2026 · topstep.com47 changes pending review since Jun 14, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$49
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_cap_basis, payout_processing_time.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Payout cap basis is unknown for at least one capped public payout rule.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): fee_monthly|fee_onetime
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmin_payout_amount
6.jpg&w=96&q=75)
Legends TradingEstimatedLabeled lower-confidence rankingPartly unverified inputs: some of this firm's rules have no public source (last public source 2026-03-17), so this uses their last stored values.
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · thelegendstrading.com143 changes pending review since Apr 11, 2026May be out of dateEstimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$59
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: fee_monthly|fee_onetime.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): fee_monthly|fee_onetimeValue is present in legacy/raw model data but lacks confirming public evidence in this adapter input.
Blocking public fields
fee_monthly|fee_onetime
7
Checked Oct 5, 2026 · fundedfuturesnetwork.comLast verified Jun 15, 2026 — source not machine-readable (fundedfuturesnetwork.zendesk.com)395 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$63
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_processing_time.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Some public product/rule fields are still unavailable and must stay visible as blockers.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): fee_monthly|fee_onetime
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmin_payout_amount
8%2520(1).png&w=96&q=75)
Checked Jun 16, 2026 · help.alpha-futures.com84 changes pending review since Apr 6, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$79
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_processing_time.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Some public product/rule fields are still unavailable and must stay visible as blockers.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): fee_monthly|fee_onetime
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_request
9
Checked Jun 30, 2026 · fundednext.comVerified Jun 17, 2026 · fundednext.com105 changes pending review since Jul 8, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$79.99
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, funded_monthly_fee, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_cadence, payout_cap_basis, payout_processing_time.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Payout cap basis is unknown for at least one capped public payout rule.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): fee_monthly|fee_onetime
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefunded_monthly_feemin_payout_amount
10
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · takeprofittrader.com61 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$90
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses topic metric with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_processing_time.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Some public product/rule fields are still unavailable and must stay visible as blockers.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): fee_monthly|fee_onetime
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_request
11
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · tradeify.co282 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Unavailable public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$99
Why this rank
Unavailable public evidenceUnavailable
This ranking uses topic metric with unavailable model inputs. Required model inputs are unavailable from ordinary public material, so this output should not be used for ranking or scenario decisions.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, consistency_progression, daily_loss_limit_dollars, drawdown_type, eval_price, failure_recovery_type, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, golden_fixture_public_evidence, live_transition_eligibility, max_drawdown_dollars, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_cap_basis, payout_cap_progression, payout_frequency, payout_processing_time, profit_split_pct, profit_target_dollars, repurchase_fee, reset_fee, safety_net_amount.
1 derived public1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Unavailable public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Path selected: 25K Growth Evaluation -> 25K Growth Funded
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredconsistency_progressiondaily_loss_limit_dollarsdrawdown_type
Selected path25K Growth Evaluation -> 25K Growth FundedPath choice required
This product has multiple funded outcomes. Rankings stay labeled until a visible public funded path is selected.
25K Growth Evaluation -> 25K Growth Funded ($5,000, live after 3)50K Growth Evaluation -> 50K Growth Funded ($12,000, live after 3)100K Growth Evaluation -> 100K Growth Funded ($15,500, live after 3)150K Growth Evaluation -> 150K Growth Funded ($19,500, live after 3)
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I start a prop firm for under $100?
Yes. Current evaluations under $100 are offered by Alpha Futures, Apex Trader Funding, DayTraders, Funded Futures Network, FundedNext Futures, Legends Trading and 5 more.
What account size can I get for under $100?
Current evaluations under $100 are for 25K, 50K, 100K, 150K and 300K accounts.
Are sub-$100 prop firms worth it?
The low entry cost makes it easy to try multiple firms. Compare the rules and payout terms, not just the price.