One-Time Fee Prop Firms With 90%+ Splits
Pay once with no recurring fees and keep 90% or more of your profits. The best value combination.
Public Evidence Status
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
0 ready6 lower-confidence0 unavailable
1
Checked Jul 10, 2026 · apextraderfunding.com77 changes pending review since Sep 30, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
100% / $19.9
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_processing_time.
1 public evidence
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Up to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfee_monthly|fee_onetimefield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_fee
2
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · daytraders.com269 changes pending review since Jun 13, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
100% / $22.5
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, payout_cap_basis.
1 public evidence1 derived public
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Selected comparison outcome: 100K Static Evaluation
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmin_payout_amount
Selected path100K Static EvaluationReady
25K EOD Evaluation25K Full Evaluation25K Static Evaluation25K Straight to Funded
3
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · tradeify.co282 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
90% / $99
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, consistency_progression, daily_loss_limit_dollars, drawdown_type, eval_price, failure_recovery_type, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, golden_fixture_public_evidence, live_transition_eligibility, max_drawdown_dollars, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_cap_basis, payout_cap_progression, payout_frequency, payout_processing_time, profit_split_pct, profit_target_dollars, repurchase_fee, reset_fee, safety_net_amount.
1 public evidence
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Up to 90% profit share
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredconsistency_progressiondaily_loss_limit_dollarsdrawdown_type
4
Checked Aug 3, 2026 · lucidtrading.com335 changes pending review since Apr 11, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
90% / $100
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: capital_efficiency_score, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, field_evidence_ledger, max_loss_exposure_before_first_payout, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_cap_basis, payout_friction_score, time_to_first_payout_days, total_cost_to_first_payout.
1 derived public1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Selected comparison outcome: 100K LucidDirect
Blocking public fields
capital_efficiency_scorefee_monthly|fee_onetimefield_evidence_ledgermax_loss_exposure_before_first_payoutmin_profitable_days_before_payout
Selected path100K LucidDirectPartial public data
25K LucidFlex Evaluation -> 25K LucidFlex Funded25K LucidPro Evaluation -> 25K LucidPro Funded25K LucidDirect50K LucidFlex Evaluation -> 50K LucidFlex Funded
5
Checked Oct 5, 2026 · fundedfuturesnetwork.comLast verified Jun 15, 2026 — source not machine-readable (fundedfuturesnetwork.zendesk.com)395 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90% / $75
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses profit split with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, max_profit_split_pct, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_processing_time.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Some public product/rule fields are still unavailable and must stay visible as blockers.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmax_profit_split_pctmin_payout_amount
6.jpg&w=96&q=75)
Legends TradingEstimatedLabeled lower-confidence rankingPartly unverified inputs: some of this firm's rules have no public source (last public source 2026-03-17), so this uses their last stored values.
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · thelegendstrading.com143 changes pending review since Apr 11, 2026May be out of dateEstimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100% / $119
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
Frequently Asked Questions
Which one-time fee firms have the best splits?
One-time fee firms that currently pay 100% of at least some profits include Apex Trader Funding, DayTraders and Legends Trading.
Why is one-time fee plus high split the best?
You avoid recurring monthly costs and keep more of your profits. This maximizes your net return on the evaluation investment.
Do one-time fee firms have worse drawdown?
Not necessarily. Fee structure and drawdown are independent: compare each firm's drawdown type and amount in the list above.