One-Time Fee Prop Firms With 90%+ Splits
Pay once with no recurring fees and keep 90% or more of your profits. The best value combination.
Public Evidence Status
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
0 ready6 lower-confidence0 unavailable
1
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100% / $19.9
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
2
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100% / $22.5
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
3.jpg&w=96&q=75)
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100% / $59
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 100% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 90% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 90% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
6
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90% / $100
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses profit split with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct.
1 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pctUp to 90% profit share
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pct
Frequently Asked Questions
Which one-time fee firms have the best splits?
DayTraders (100%), Lucid Pro (100% first $10K), and E8 (80%) all charge one-time fees. DayTraders and Lucid offer the highest splits.
Why is one-time fee plus high split the best?
You avoid recurring monthly costs and keep more of your profits. This maximizes your net return on the evaluation investment.
Do one-time fee firms have worse drawdown?
Not necessarily. Lucid and Legends offer EOD trailing with competitive drawdown limits. Fee structure and drawdown are independent.