Best Futures Prop Firms in 2026
The top-ranked futures prop firms for 2026 — compared by fees, payouts, drawdown, and trader rules.
Public Evidence Status
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
0 ready12 lower-confidence2 unavailable
1
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · daytraders.com269 changes pending review since Jun 13, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency100% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
2%2520(1).png&w=96&q=75)
Checked Jun 16, 2026 · help.alpha-futures.com84 changes pending review since Apr 6, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency90% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
3
Checked Oct 5, 2026 · fundedfuturesnetwork.comLast verified Jun 15, 2026 — source not machine-readable (fundedfuturesnetwork.zendesk.com)395 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency90% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
4
Checked Aug 3, 2026 · lucidtrading.com335 changes pending review since Apr 11, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency90% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
5
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · tradeify.co282 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency90% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
6
Checked Jun 30, 2026 · fundednext.comVerified Jun 17, 2026 · fundednext.com105 changes pending review since Jul 8, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
80%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency80% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
7
Checked Jun 29, 2026 · myfundedfutures.comVerified Jun 12, 2026 · myfundedfutures.com200 changes pending review since Jun 14, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
80%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency80% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
8
Checked Jul 17, 2026 · tradeday.comVerified Jun 12, 2026 · tradeday.com170 changes pending review since Jun 18, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
80%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency80% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
9
Checked Oct 5, 2026 · purdia.com388 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
90%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency90% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
10
Checked Jul 10, 2026 · apextraderfunding.com77 changes pending review since Sep 30, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency100% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
11
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · takeprofittrader.com61 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
80%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency80% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
12.jpg&w=96&q=75)
Legends TradingEstimatedLabeled lower-confidence rankingPartly unverified inputs: some of this firm's rules have no public source (last public source 2026-03-17), so this uses their last stored values.
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · thelegendstrading.com143 changes pending review since Apr 11, 2026May be out of dateEstimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
100%
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingEstimated
This ranking uses topic metric with estimated model inputs. Numeric output can run, but at least one input is an explicit assumption or legacy fallback rather than confirmed ordinary public evidence.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency100% profit split
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
13
Checked Jun 21, 2026 · e8markets.com76 changes pending review since Apr 6, 2026May be out of date
Unavailable public evidence is labeled before comparison.
Unavailable
Why this rank
Unavailable public evidenceUnavailable
This ranking uses topic metric with unavailable model inputs. Required model inputs are unavailable from ordinary public material, so this output should not be used for ranking or scenario decisions.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
1 legacy fallback1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Unavailable public evidence is labeled before comparison.Unavailable public evidence: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequencyMissing public split evidence
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
14
Checked Jun 16, 2026 · topstep.com47 changes pending review since Jun 14, 2026May be out of date
Unavailable public evidence is labeled before comparison.
Unavailable
Why this rank
Unavailable public evidenceUnavailable
This ranking uses topic metric with unavailable model inputs. Required model inputs are unavailable from ordinary public material, so this output should not be used for ranking or scenario decisions.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency.
1 legacy fallback1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Unavailable public evidence is labeled before comparison.Unavailable public evidence: max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequencyMissing public split evidence
Blocking public fields
max_profit_split_pctpayout_frequency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best prop firm in 2026?
The best firm depends on your priorities: cost, split, drawdown type and payout rules. The ranking above orders firms on current published rules.
How many prop firms are there in 2026?
There are 14+ established CME futures prop firms. New firms launch regularly, but not all are reputable. Stick to well-reviewed firms.
Are prop firms still profitable in 2026?
Yes. Prop firms provide funded capital without personal financial risk. The key is choosing firms with favorable rules for your trading style.
What changed in prop firms for 2026?
Firms change fees, plans and payout rules often in 2026. Each firm page lists the rule changes PropVault has detected, with dates.