Prop Firms That Transition to Live Accounts
Graduate from sim to real live trading. These prop firms offer a path from funded simulation to a live brokerage account.
Public Evidence Status
Ready public-evidence plans are sorted ahead of partial or unavailable plans when possible, and missing public fields cannot look favorable in the ranking.
0 ready4 lower-confidence0 unavailable
1
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · daytraders.com269 changes pending review since Jun 13, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$22.5
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses payout access with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: buffer_clearance_required, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, payout_cap_basis.
1 public evidence1 derived public
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Selected comparison outcome: 100K Static Evaluation
Blocking public fields
buffer_clearance_requiredfield_evidence_ledgerfunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmin_payout_amount
Selected path100K Static EvaluationReady
25K EOD Evaluation25K Full Evaluation25K Static Evaluation25K Straight to Funded
2
Checked Jun 12, 2026 · tradeify.co282 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.
$99
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses payout access with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, consistency_progression, daily_loss_limit_dollars, drawdown_type, eval_price, failure_recovery_type, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, golden_fixture_public_evidence, live_transition_eligibility, max_drawdown_dollars, max_payout_per_request, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, min_trading_days, payout_cap_basis, payout_cap_progression, payout_frequency, payout_processing_time, profit_split_pct, profit_target_dollars, repurchase_fee, reset_fee, safety_net_amount.
1 derived public1 unavailable
Ranking reasons
Lower-confidence ranking: partial public evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Selected comparison outcome: 100K Select Evaluation -> 100K Select Flex
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredconsistency_progressiondaily_loss_limit_dollarsdrawdown_type
Selected path100K Select Evaluation -> 100K Select FlexPartial public data
25K Growth Evaluation -> 25K Growth Funded ($5,000, live after 3)25K Select Evaluation -> 25K Select Daily ($3,000, live after 3)25K Select Evaluation -> 25K Select Flex ($6,250, live after 3)25K Lightning ($5,000, live after 3)
3%2520(1).png&w=96&q=75)
Checked Jun 16, 2026 · help.alpha-futures.com84 changes pending review since Apr 6, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$79
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses payout access with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, max_profit_split_pct, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, payout_frequency, payout_processing_time.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Some public product/rule fields are still unavailable and must stay visible as blockers.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredfunded_monthly_feemax_payout_per_requestmax_profit_split_pct
4
Checked Oct 5, 2026 · purdia.com388 changes pending review since Apr 3, 2026May be out of date
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.
$179
Why this rank
Labeled lower-confidence rankingPartial
This ranking uses payout access with partial model inputs. Some model inputs are visible in ordinary public material, but one or more public fields are missing or unavailable.
Informational comparison from ordinary public product/help/rule material. Missing public values stay visible as blockers instead of being treated as neutral.
Primary model note: rankings prioritize rule-derived difficulty, economic friction, constraints, and trader fit from ordinary public product/rule evidence; EV/pass probability are secondary scenario comparison estimates.
Rule-derived ranking blocked by missing public fields: activation_fee, buffer_clearance_required, capital_efficiency_score, fee_monthly|fee_onetime, field_evidence_ledger, funded_monthly_fee, max_payout_per_request, max_profit_split_pct, min_payout_amount, min_profitable_days_before_payout, minimum_profit_before_first_payout, payout_frequency, payout_friction_score, payout_processing_time.
2 legacy fallback
Ranking reasons
Estimated ranking: assumption-based evidence is labeled before comparison.Partial public data: Field evidence ledger is missing, so legacy model-ready status cannot be used for public ranking or formula-grade outputs.Estimated model output (assumed inputs): max_profit_split_pct, payout_frequency
Blocking public fields
activation_feebuffer_clearance_requiredcapital_efficiency_scorefee_monthly|fee_onetimefield_evidence_ledger
Frequently Asked Questions
What does live account transition mean?
After meeting payout milestones, the firm moves you from a simulated funded account to a real live brokerage account with real market execution.
Which prop firms offer live accounts?
Several firms move funded traders to live accounts after a set number of payouts or profit. Each firm page lists its current live transition rule.
Is a live account better than simulated funded?
Live accounts offer real market fills (no simulated slippage), often lift payout caps, and provide a track record with a real brokerage.
How long does it take to reach live?
It depends on the firm's transition rule (a payout count or profit threshold) and your trading. Each firm page lists its current live transition rule.